Or as I affectionately call them, the booty awards. (Technically, the Book of the Year Awards.)
Since I put my name on the judging sheets and since I suspect I judged them harder than others did, I thought I’d write a note here about my philosophy on judging them.
To me, it’s like judging the Olympics rather than the five-year-old competition or judging for the spot in the symphony rather than high school State orchestra. It’s judging the books as published books, not against anyone who’s ever typed a phrase.
Which means if 3 (out of five) is average, 3 is on par with all published books. Which means I gave mostly 3s. 5s, to me, are perfect 10s (though sadly we’ll never see that again in Olympic gymnastics, not that I’m bitter). 5s are Pulitzer quality.
Also, I judged as a reader, not a writer. In other words, I in no way meant to imply by not giving a 5 that I assume I could do better. Quite the contrary! These books have been published for a reason, and my judging is not a statement on what should be published and what shouldn’t be but how it stands as a published book.
One last note. I’ll probably get in trouble somewhere for saying this, but c’est la vie. Karen Harter, author of Autumn Blue, passed away about a month ago. This may sound selfish, but I’m sad she’ll never see my comments because this was my favorite book of those I judged. I told her I’m now a Karen Harter fan. I told her I want to gather all her books and read them through and through. So I’m saying that here. I’m telling you to read Autumn Blue, and though I haven’t read Where Mercy Flows yet, I suspect it’s good as well.
So there you have it.






